跳到主要內容
比較

n8n 對比 Make

兩個定價模式差異很大的自動化平台。以下是哪一個適合你的工作流程。

我們的結論

如果你想要完全託管、視覺化、且無需維護的自動化,請選擇 Make。如果你有懂技術的人,並預期會有大量的使用量,請選擇 n8n,因為自行架設可以避開每次操作的收費。若是第一個自動化,Make 的起步較快。

 n8nMake
起始價格免費方案免費方案
免費方案
易用性55/10068/100
適合技術團隊
最適合Save admin time, Automate marketingSave admin time, Automate marketing
價格查核

n8n

Source-available workflow automation you can self-host — strong for technical teams.

Make

Visual automation platform — powerful, flexible, and cheaper at scale than many alternatives.

常見問題

Which is better for a technical team, n8n or Make?

n8n is closer to a developer tool — you can self-host it, write custom JavaScript in nodes, and avoid per-task pricing. Make is fully hosted and visual-first, which suits teams that want zero infrastructure to manage.

Which is cheaper at scale?

Self-hosted n8n has no per-execution fee beyond hosting costs, which usually makes it cheaper at high volume. Make and Zapier both charge by task/operation, which adds up faster as usage grows.

仍然不確定嗎?

做 2 分鐘的測驗,我們會為你的企業推薦合適的選擇。

進行測驗